email a friend
printable version
Protected-area designation may not be the full, or best, solution for conserving African IBAs

Tana River Delta IBA, Kenya © Michel Laplace-Toulouse

Some 55% of the 159 Important Bird Areas in Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda have been assessed as being ‘highly threatened’, including many which are formally protected.  For eight of the nine unprotected IBAs in Uganda, community-based management, rather than formal designation, is thought to be the more appropriate means of ensuring their protection.


(a) Relationship between protection status and threat at 159 IBAs in three East African countries

Three BirdLife Partner Organisations in East Africa (NatureKenya, NatureUganda and the Ethiopian Wildlife and Natural History Society) have carried out an exercise to set priorities for action among their Important Bird Areas (IBAs). Biological value (based on bird importance scores) and overall threat were each summarised on a four-point scale and combined to give urgency scores (a measure of the likely biodiversity loss if no action is taken soon).

Of the 159 IBAs in the three countries, more than half (55%) were assessed as highly threatened (scores of 3 or 4). Even among IUCN-recognised protected areas (categories I–VI), 45% of sites were highly threatened. Other kinds of protected areas, such as Forest Reserves, were substantially more threatened than sites with no protection (see figure a).


(b) Priorities for conservation action among IBAs in Uganda

For Uganda, the 30 IBAs were assigned to three classes for conservation action based on their urgency scores: ‘critical’ (the most pressing), ‘urgent’ and ‘high’ (figure b). The 11 critical sites include four National Parks (the highest level of legal protection), showing once again that legal designation is no guarantee of effective protection. In three of these National Parks, however, the most pressing management issues lie outside the site. For the unprotected IBAs, community-based management—rather than designation under current protected areas legislation—appears to be more appropriate for nearly all (figure c).

 


(c) The single most appropriate and important responses for the 30 IBAs in Uganda


Acknowledgements

Analysis by NatureKenya, NatureUganda and the Ethiopian Wildlife and Natural History Society, using data held in BirdLife’s World Bird Database and additional information on threats and potential responses.

Compiled 2004

Recommended Citation:
BirdLife International (2004) Protected-area designation may not be the full, or best, solution for conserving African IBAs. Presented as part of the BirdLife State of the world's birds website. Available from: http://birdlife.org/datazone/sowb/casestudy/250. Checked: 25/10/2014